Skip to content


General Thoughts on the Pence vs Kaine Debate

I’m not really going to go into policy statements, since that is an ineffective use of time, and the general public doesn’t really care about that minutia.

Pence: Talked in a methodical and level headed tone. He seemed steady and very put together. While he didn’t go out of his way to defend Trump, he brushed aside criticism of his running mate as “not true” or “false”, which (while not totally accurate) was authoritative. He looked the part of a VP.

Kaine: Talked in a rapid manner. His body language was very poor, and his face gave off an unlikeable vibe. His general tone was negative, which cast him in a poor light.

Overall, Pence came out the winner, although he did contradict Trump quite a bit on Russia, which wasn’t optimal.

It’s doubtful as to whether any of this will have an effect on Trump or Hillary, as average people aren’t all that interested in either VP pick. There wasn’t any big moment in the debate, so it’ll probably fade into the ether once any interesting story (presidential or otherwise) enters the news cycle.

Gay Porn and Children? In Defense of Sargon of Akkad

People are sharing gay porn with children on twitter. Why? To fight racism, of course. This all started a week ago, when brave Rationalist and egalitarian Sargon of Akkad took issue with being called a “nigger” online. Getting upset about words posted online is a responsible adult reaction, and being a responsible adult imbued with the power of Rationality, Sargon set about by sharing hardcore gay pornography with his followers.

How did sharing images of anuses getting reamed serve to fight racism? Well, it’s quite simple when you think about it. Only a Social Justice Warrior (yuck, irrational!) would take issue at sexually explicit images randomly appearing on their feeds. Who else would have a reaction of disgust? The fact that racists were grossed out at  healthy and normal expressions of love (hardcore gay porn) proves that their racism is not only irrational, but also just plain incorrect.

Some might say that Sargon did wrong by sending hardcore pornography to the feeds of thousands of children who follow him. They would be incorrect. After all, it’s the job of parents to keep their kids safe.

When a man on the street exposes himself to a kids on fieldtrip, nobody says the exhibitionist is at fault. The guy with his junk out isn’t a bad person, the parents who let their children go to school are.

Since the posting, I’ve received messages from children who said that they or their younger siblings where disturbed at what popped up on their feed via Sargon’s account (which they followed for his social commentary). One thirteen year old girl even deleted her account and is dealing with fallout from her friends who she suggested follow Sargon. Good for them. These racist bigot thirteen year old girls need to be shown that non-egalitarianism is just unacceptable.

(racists on suicide watch)

If sharing gay porn with children is the price to pay to prove that IQ data, history, evolution, game theory, and Robert Putnam are wrong, then that’s what needs to be done. Only a morally grandstanding public racist who wants to be looked up to in society would say that children shouldn’t be sent gay pornography.



Rationalists care about truth, not the myth of youthful innocence. A few kids are going to be emotionally disturbed, who cares? Racism has been defeated.


Sargon’s great work exposing the logical flaws in the concept of racial diversity cannot be understated. That’s why the deletion of his gay porn stash is so puzzling. This work was his magnum opus, so why did he delete it? He didn’t fall for the “moral” argument regarding the ethics of sharing gay porn with children. Sargon did nothing wrong, so he shouldn’t have removed his hard work destroying racism.

The Richest Black Neighborhood In America Has A Higher Rate Of Crime Than The Poorest White Neighborhood In America

As per these sources for the richest black and poorest white areas:

The richest black neighborhood in America has more crime than the poorest white neighborhood in America.

Read More →

Milo: The Not So Dangerous Faggot

Milo calls himself the “Dangerous Faggot.” While it is true that he is indeed homosexual, what exactly is dangerous about him?

Milo has stated that homosexuals are the creatives of society, the risk takers. How is that dangerous? Society worships the homosexual. The mainstream narrative glorifies sodomites in all forms of media, from the news to Hollywood productions and primetime television. Society says homosexual behavior is good, Milo agrees.

The mainstream narrative is that racists are bad people. Milo also derides racists. Where is the “dangerous” in that?

All across society, a constant message of “be who you are” is broadcast 24/7. Gay pride, transsexualism, and miscegenation are nonstop themes everywhere you look. Milo is a homosexual, extols the virtues of race mixing (homosexual, yet race mixing nonetheless), and recently dressed in drag. Is that counter culture?

Milo’s entire persona is one of excess, from his flamboyant nature to his theatrical bent. The world around us can only be described as sickeningly consumerist. Imbibe, acquire, experiment. There is no contrast to be found in the entirety of Milo’s shtick.

Cultural libertarianism is currently Milo’s political ideology, if you can call it that. At its core is the wish to be left alone to do whatever you want, free from impediment. There’s not much else to it. How is that dangerous? Freedom is not a controversial idea. Its vague, alluring, and pleasant sounding. Not exactly the stuff that causes parents to shield a young child’s eyes and ears.

Milo won’t even go on the most popular Alt-Right podcast, The Daily Shoah, because he fears being confronted by the actual alt-right.

Milo has called the core of the alt-right (TheRightStuff, Daily Stormer, etc.) fringe elements, not representative of the alt-right. Milo has also stated that he’s not a part of the alt-right. If the entirety of Milo is nothing more than a sparkling façade, why should anybody trust him to define a group of people he’s not a part of, whose very actions contradict his claims? Milo isn’t brave or dangerous. He won’t even go on the most popular Alt-Right podcast, The Daily Shoah, because he fears being confronted by the actual alt-right. Instead, he visits pot heads like Joe Rogan, knowing that he’ll just barely be the smartest in the room.

Where is the danger in Milo? Not in his ideology, he has none. Not in his social stances, he stands with modernity. Not in his economic policy, nobody knows what his is. The only “danger” that Milo poses is the possibility that he will continue to misrepresent the alt-right as a soulless movement of social libertines without any long-term goals or aspirations. The alt-right (what is the alt-right?) is not a hollow vehicle for Milo, as much as he may wish that to be the case.

Milo is not dangerous in any meaningful sense. He rose to prominence on the back of controversy around video games. He apes the posture of that which is actually dangerous: the alt-right. All flash and no substance, the only danger he poses is his function as yet another contact vector for grids.

Hillary’s Health: A Lose-Lose Situation

Hillary is sick. Everybody knows it, and now that she fainted in the process of abandoning a highly publicized 9/11 speech, her official campaign is can no longer deny that Hillary is ill.


Currently, the Hillary camp is saying she has pneumonia. Even if this is the correct diagnoses, there is more going on with Hillary’s health. Pneumonia doesn’t cause this:



Pneumonia also doesn’t cause this:



So, let’s assume the Hillary camp is telling half truths and she has pneumonia as well as some other health problems. Will they be able to hide whatever else is bugging Clinton? If they somehow pull it off, how are they going to damage control this imagery of her putting a young minority girl in danger of catching her illness?


Hillary was sick and still got in the face of an innocent little girl? What type of monster does that?


Now, how will the Hillary camp minimize the chances of another weird shaking or spaz attack? Most likely, they’ll further isolate her from public appearances. This is no good, however, because that furthers Trump’s narrative that Hillary is weak and unfit for public office.


Just a perfectly healthy adult being helped up four steps.
Just a perfectly healthy adult being helped up four steps.


The longer Hillary goes without being seen, the more feeble she appears.

The more Hillary goes out in public, the higher her unfavorability ratings are, and the greater chance she has yet another moment that highlights her general instability. There is no win condition here. To borrow chess terminology, if Trump refrains from a news-cycle shifting gaffe, Hillary is in check-mate.

Looking Back On 9/11

On this fifteenth anniversary of 9/11, let’s take a moment to reflect on the deaths of those who died in the towers. Their last memories perhaps a smoky cubicle with passed out bodies to their left and right, the stench of burning smoke and acrid flesh wafting through the air. Alright, now that that’s done, time to focus on important things in life. Things like appreciating the beautiful bounties of Muslim immigration. Let’s take a look at all the positives that importing Arabs has introduced.

Muslims drive taxis! Sure, sometimes they barely speak English, but who else is going to do drive people around? Remember the pre-1965 world before taxis? Let’s not let the small amount of Muslims who mutilate female genitalia distract from the important things like getting a convenient ride from point A to point B.

Ever had a kebab? You can thank the people over at the local former Church that’s been re-purposed as a Mosque. Waking up to the sound of wailing in a foreign language is a small price to pay for good food that only Muslims are physically capable of making. Perhaps in the future, some way of transferring recipes will be possible, but until then, foreigners are absolutely necessary to create such exquisite dishes such as meat on a stick. Don’t let the desire for a united Western culture make your stomach go empty!

As if all those perks of Muslim immigration into American communities were not enough, there is more to come! It’s only a matter of time until segregated swimming pools are instituted, like the ones now seen in enriched Germany and vibrant Sweden. The forward thinking Muslim men have it right when they grope little girls who obstruct the swimming lanes. If you can’t swim without some ten year old thot asking for it, what’s the point of even getting in the water?

Any sane person agrees that western women have become too sexualized. That is why we must revert to the end of the spectrum and remove all freedom from them. They shouldn’t dress like sluts, so of course they should be clothed in curtains, with little holes for eyes. What better way to enforce this than to import more Muslims? There simply isn’t a better culture to import than Islam’s.

Yes, we can reflect on the past. We can recognize that certain people of a certain religion did certain things which aren’t pleasant. But please, let’s not get carried away and think that we should take action in order to prevent similar occurrences from taking place in the future. It’s not like Muslim terrorism is an ongoing issue that follows Muslims wherever they go. 9/11 happened, but it’s an isolated event. Everybody just move on and accept the new reality of a multicultural utopia, it’s what the hundreds of dead mothers and fathers broiled alive would have wanted. Go out and thank a Muslim today.